Subject: Re: Venting From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 02:23:57 +0800 |
>Most of the implementors of the XSL processors apparently have felt this >way from the start in my opinion since some are working on the >Transformation process and others are working on the "FO" section. There are other factors. I can't speak for James Clark but I suspect that one of the reasons that XT just does XTL is that it is for testing that part of the spec that JamesC is the editor for. I am working on XFL because JamesC had already done XT and it seemed silly to reinvent something JamesC was already infinitely more capable of writing than me. James T XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Keith Visco | Thread | RE: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
XSL/XTL/XSL-T/XSL-F discussion with, XSL-List Owner | Date | RE: Venting, Didier PH Martin |
Month |