Subject: Re: (XML + XSL) * n diffrent XSL processor = n diffrent results From: Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus@xxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:00:29 -0500 (EST) |
Thanks for the good word. I really appreciate it! -scott kvisco/17:37 PM Please respond to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus) Subject: Re: (XML + XSL) * n diffrent XSL processor = n diffrent results For now this is probably true, as the XSL WD gets closer to completion and more flushed out you should see the differences decreasing. Leaving IE5 out of the picture, Whitespace should be your primary difference I would hope at this point. I know Scott Boag (LotusXSL) has been trying very hard to make the output of LotusXSL similar to the output of XT. I have been using Scott's test suite to try and match the output of XSL:P to both Lotus and XT. --Keith anette.engel@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > As a newbie to XSL I got more and more confused with every stylesheet > I wrote and every XSL processor I started to used(so far IE5, XT and > LotusXSL). > > When I have one XML document and one stylesheet and I use diffrent > processors I always get diffrent results. > > (Well keeps me busy). > > Regards > Anette > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (XML + XSL) * n diffrent XSL pr, Keith Visco | Thread | CSS and XSL, Paul Prescod |
Fw: Fw: CSS and XSL, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: CSS and XSL, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |