RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)

Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 09:52:35 +0000

You might well be right, but lets give XSL a chance on this one an reserve
judgement until the language gets out the door, eh?

And generating VRML with XSL does sound like a styling process if one
regards VRML as a formatting, rather than just simple preprocessing.

Have you got any examples of work available publically on the Net? I
wouldn't mind a gander at what you're doing. It's out of my field, but it
would be nice to see how other developers are addressing their formatting
needs (one can often pick up new techniques from looking at those of other


xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/26/99 01:06:06 AM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)

NO matter their origin, my opinion is that market and common sense will
drive XSL to evolve as a standard general purpose XML preprocessor.
In fact we are working on VRML generation straight from XSL rules.
any else are working on that?

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread