Subject: Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL? From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:55:00 +0200 |
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Hi Oren. > >When you say XSL is a subset of XQL I assume you are neatly snipping away >the XSL FOs... they aren't gone quite yet... so XSL is not a subset of XQL. I stand corrected. XTL, then. >But I'll play along as I know the valid point you where making :) > >You do however raise an interesting issue though.... do we want to lock XSL >into the relationship you describe... being a subset of XQL? I'd rather see it as locking XQL to be a superset of XSL, instead. I strongly believe that this should be a requirement of any proposed XQL language. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
xsl tutorials, Carmi | Thread | Re: Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?, Guy_Murphy |
Re: 2 level sorting, Shekhar Kshirsagar | Date | xsl tutorials, Carmi |
Month |