Subject: Re: W3C-transformation language petition From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:50:00 +0100 |
Chris Maden wrote: > Some > argue that CSS2 already goes too far (though I don't agree, but the > allegations alone are evidence of a problem). I have to disagree. Some argue that because browser vendors take a lot of time to implement what they helped to standardize in W3C WGs. Document [1] lists a lot of user requests for CSS extensions. That document is an evidence that CSS does not go too far and that users are hardly waiting for more. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-CSS-potential </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden |
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden | Date | Re: xsl tutorials, Shekhar Kshirsagar |
Month |