Subject: Re: W3C-transformation language petition From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:57:58 -0500 |
At 11:27 AM 3/8/99 -0500, Chris Maden wrote: >[Daniel Glazman] >> Document [1] lists a lot of user requests for CSS extensions. That >> document is an evidence that CSS does not go too far and that users >> are hardly waiting for more. > >Well, people definitely want to do more, and CSS was the only game in >town. That doesn't necessarily mean that CSS should let them do more. > >It's an age-old problem in communications, as any tech support rep >knows; a user will say, "I want to do X," when they mean, "I want to >do Y and I think that X is the way to do it." I'm not saying CSS >shouldn't grow, only that requests for it to do so are not evidence >that those making the requests really want it to, especially if the >price is that it becomes less usable for simple tasks. This is self-serving (for XSL) at best. It really sounds like you're calling for a managed and deliberate end to the growth of CSS, cutting off its air supply for future development. Funny how that would tend to divert more resources and people in need of advanced functionality to XSL. The final sentence seems like a softener - "I'm not saying that CSS shouldn't grow" - but think about it - that really does seem to be what the rest of this message is saying, no easy way around it. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April) Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden |
XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Chris Maden |
Month |