Subject: Re: xsl:lambda was RE: W3C-transformation language petition From: james anderson <James.Anderson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:35:00 +0100 |
"structure and interpretation of computer programs" (noted below) is a bit much for an introduction. i'd recommend something more like graham's "ansi common lisp". (if we're pointing at amazon, that would be "http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0133708756/".) he's also done a more discursive "on lisp" ("http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0130305529/"), which, from its description, sounds like an even closer fit, but i've no personal experience with its content. Steven Marcus wrote: > > the bible: > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0262011530/ > > good luck! > Steven > > ---Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jonathan. > > > > This isn't the first time I've seen discussion of LISP as a good > example of > > a declarative language, with relevance to XSL. > > > > Can anybody recommend some good primer material on the Net? I'm not > > interested in learning LISP for application development, just to see > what I > > might learn about declarative models in general, and specifically > how it > > relates to XSL. Something discussing LISP methodologies as they might > > differ from traditional imperative methodologies would be ideal. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: xsl:lambda was RE: W3C-transfor, Steven Marcus | Thread | RE: lambda was RE: W3C-transformati, Jonathan Borden |
Re: Make money fast! ... with XSL :, James Tauber | Date | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Ian Hickson |
Month |