Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken) From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:52:15 -0500 |
At 06:59 1999 04 13 -0700, Eduardo Gutentag wrote: >The DELEGATE proposal came from James Tauber, not James Clark. And was included (slighly modified) in TR9401:1997. >Eduardo > >> From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken) >> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400 >> >> > That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs >> > pointing to all sizable chunks of information. It's not a manifest for a >> particular >> > document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it >> > referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to >> add for >> > particular use-cases. >> > >> >> The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James >> Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal). >> >> FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only* >> packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good. >> >> >> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), James Tauber | Thread | Snaking columns, Eric E. Cohen, CPA |
TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was , Paul Grosso | Date | Problem instantiating XMLDOMDocume, Amit Rekhi |
Month |