RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)

Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
From: Eduardo Gutentag <Eduardo.Gutentag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 06:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
The DELEGATE proposal came from James Tauber, not James Clark.

Eduardo

>  From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
>  Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400
>  
>  > That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs
>  > pointing to all sizable chunks of information.  It's not a manifest for a
>  particular
>  > document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it
>  > referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to
>  add for
>  > particular use-cases.
>  >
>  
>  The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James
>  Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal).
>  
>  FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only*
>  packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good.
>  
>  
>   XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread