Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken) From: Eduardo Gutentag <Eduardo.Gutentag@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 06:59:56 -0700 (PDT) |
The DELEGATE proposal came from James Tauber, not James Clark. Eduardo > From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken) > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400 > > > That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs > > pointing to all sizable chunks of information. It's not a manifest for a > particular > > document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it > > referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to > add for > > particular use-cases. > > > > The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James > Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal). > > FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only* > packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good. > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), James Tauber |
RE: Grand Unification Theory (XSL/X, Didier PH Martin | Date | Building a new tree, Bovone Stefano |
Month |