Subject: RE: XSL as a better XPointer From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:38:19 -0400 |
Hi Chris, <Comment> There are a number of existing mechanisms in place for W3C WGs to communicate requirements and dependencies to one another, such as coordination groups (which have weekly teleconferences), meetings of chairs, staff contact liaisons, and so on. So, yes, your wish to be wrong was granted ;-) </Comment> <reply> Thanks for the precision. </reply> Comment> Could you post some examples because I really don't see the problem form here; there is one W3C spec on namespaces and both XPointer and XSL and indeed all other XML-using WGs all use this same mechanism. <Comment> <reply> in XPointer: all descendent of a particular element descendent(all,element) in XSL: idem /element//* the same concept, two different way of expressing it. </reply> regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL as a better XPointer, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: XSL as a better XPointer, Jonathan Borden |
RE: Grand Unification Theory, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: Problem instantiating XMLDOMDo, Didier PH Martin |
Month |