RE: XSL as a better XPointer

Subject: RE: XSL as a better XPointer
From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:38:19 -0400
Hi Chris,

<Comment>
There are a number of existing mechanisms in place for W3C WGs to
communicate requirements and dependencies to one another, such as
coordination groups (which have weekly teleconferences), meetings of
chairs, staff contact liaisons, and so on.  So, yes, your wish to be
wrong was granted ;-)
</Comment>

<reply>
Thanks for the precision. 
</reply>

Comment>
Could you post some examples because I really don't see the problem form
here; there is one W3C spec on namespaces and both XPointer and XSL and
indeed all other XML-using WGs all use this same mechanism.
<Comment>

<reply>
in XPointer: all descendent of a particular element

descendent(all,element)

in XSL: idem
/element//*

the same concept, two different way of expressing it.
</reply>

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread