Subject: Re: XSL as a better XPointer From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:02:41 -0400 |
Chris Lilley wrote: > > >Jonathan Borden wrote: > >> However, we see that with a few extensions, namely XQL, the XSL pattern >> matching language (language #3) can serve as an effective XML pointer >> description language. A range is a funny sort of 'pointer' in any case, it >> corresponds to a paired start location/pointer and end location/pointer. > >> This can be expressed as a pair of XSL/XQL patterns. > >Its not "funny"; it just means that the thing pointed to is not an >entity. Thus, it indeed needs a pair of pointers. > >Two individual points is not the same as a range, although both may be >indicated in the same way; how does XQL indicate two points (two >pointers) as opposed to a range (pair of pointers)? > Whether or not this is 'funny' depends on your sense of humor :-). I used this terminology in the context of a specification named 'XPointer', and to use my specific language *an effective XML pointer description language*. We are including a range description in this language which is fine, just to point out that the language goes beyond traditional pointers. Jonathan Borden http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL as a better XPointer, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Almost XLink..., Guy_Murphy |
Re: Processing modes, Lars Marius Garshol | Date | RE: apache,perl,xml,xsl, Britt, James |
Month |