Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 20:00:29 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > 1 there must be a specification for aural formatting objects > 2 there must be implementations of aural formatting objects > 3 the fact that the user has an aural client must be known to the server > 4 all web sites must install XTL sheets to transform content into > aural formatting objects I'm with you right up to No. 4, the fantasy part :-( I am opposed to splitting XSL into two parts because I think Microsoft will implement one part and Netscape the other. I do understand your motivation, and I think it's a good and important one. I don't think we have an answer yet. Lee -- Liam Quin, GroveWare Inc., Toronto; The barefoot programmer http://www.interlog.com/~liamquin/ irc.sorcery.net:Ankh SGML/XML/Unix/C consultant, will work for socks (and money!) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Håkon Wium Lie | Thread | RE: Formatting Objects considered h, Didier PH Martin |
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Scott S. Lawton | Date | Re: apache,perl,xml,xsl, admin |
Month |