Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:21:23 -0400 (EDT) |
[David Carlisle] > You make the point about aural rendering. It may be so that once > someone implements an aural FO renderer it turns out that what, to > the print minded view, seems like a single formatting object ought > to be two or more, to cater for aural distinctions, but surely that > can be fixed by suitable FO definitions. Exactly my thought. See my proposal, "Initial Audio Characteristics for XSL," at <URL:http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/xsl/>. It's a little old, and makes reference to ACSS instead of CSS2, but the principles hold up, I think. -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Håkon Wium Lie |
ANNOUNCE: Updated XSL Course Handou, G. Ken Holman | Date | ANNOUNCEMENT: DataChannel's XJParse, Michelle Curtis |
Month |