Subject: RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)] From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:35:53 -0500 |
At 03:29 1999 04 19 -0400, you wrote: >> If there are any bugs in the grammar of TR9401:1997 [1], I'd like to >> hear about them. I know you've made this claim before, >> Gavin, but I've never actually found any bugs nor has James. > >The grammar is ambiguous when combined with any form of extension >(which the grammar allows) because it is not possible to distinguish >keywords from the arguments to them. I don't believe that's true in the 1997 version. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (, Gavin Thomas Nicol | Thread | RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (, Gavin Thomas Nicol |
Re: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), James Tauber | Date | Re: XML/XSL Demos, Richard Lander |
Month |