RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)]

Subject: RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)]
From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:35:53 -0500
At 03:29 1999 04 19 -0400, you wrote:
>> If there are any bugs in the grammar of TR9401:1997 [1], I'd like to 
>> hear about them.  I know you've made this claim before, 
>> Gavin, but I've never actually found any bugs nor has James.
>
>The grammar is ambiguous when combined with any form of extension
>(which the grammar allows) because it is not possible to distinguish
>keywords from the arguments to them. 

I don't believe that's true in the 1997 version.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread