RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)]

Subject: RE: TR9401 catalogs [was RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)]
From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 03:29:56 -0400
> If there are any bugs in the grammar of TR9401:1997 [1], I'd like to 
> hear about them.  I know you've made this claim before, 
> Gavin, but I've never actually found any bugs nor has James.

The grammar is ambiguous when combined with any form of extension
(which the grammar allows) because it is not possible to distinguish
keywords from the arguments to them. 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread