Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 11:41:25 -0400 |
At 12:35 AM 4/19/99 +0200, Håkon Wium Lie wrote: >> > - XFO documents don't contain the semantics of the XML/XTL source > >For many, this is a feature. "Don't tell them what internal formats we >use!" "Let them pay for semantics, if they want it!" "Hey, it looks >fine to me!" Thus we lose most of the benefits XML offers to the Web - searchability, reuse, free exchange of information. And since there is a 'legitimate' business need to be served here - a way to have an XML site and make a profit off those who want enhanced features - I'm sure we're going to see this happening a _lot_, if FO's are supported widely. It's ironic that FO's - a single vocabulary for presentation - have more potential (in my opinion, anyway) for 'balkanizing' the Web than raw XML's many voices. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Håkon Wium Lie | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
Re: Not grokking keys..., Alistair MacDonald | Date | RE: xlxp-dev: XSL and editing tools, Guy_Murphy |
Month |