Re: About XSLT

Subject: Re: About XSLT
From: Sharon Adler <sca@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 10:00:10 -0400
Yes, XSLT is its own spec but it is ALSO section 2 of XSL.

It is not yet clear how we are going to organize the publication of the
joint work with XPointer.  One step at a time.

Thanks.

Sharon



At 11:23 AM 4/21/99 -0400, Richard Lander wrote:
> I am a little confused about  the official status of XSLT. It has obviously
>moved up a level from its previous home of section 2 of the XSL draft. Is it
>a spec in its own right but also a real part of the XSL and XLink? specs? In
>other words, is it a spec but also section 2 of XSL, when it is revised?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Richard.
>
>Richard Lander
>relander@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://pdbeam.uwaterloo.ca/~rlander/
>
>Professional XML Authoring - Starts May 12th
>http://www.on-line-learning.com/
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Didier PH Martin <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: XSL mailList <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 9:13 AM
>Subject: About XSLT
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks James for the subtil link to the new spec.
>>
>> So now it seems that XSLT has an official status.
>>
>> Thanks to W3C for listening our concerns.
>>
>> regards
>> Didier PH Martin
>> mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.netfolder.com
>>
>>
>>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread