Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:43:22 +0100 |
Hi. Yes you are right with regard to FOs as they currently stand. At the moment FOs in their current form can only be regarded as a starting point. For some it is perhaps an unfare bias that the first presentational objects (would it be better to talk in terms of POs ?) reflect a visual bias, but there is absolutely no reason at all why other media types and other namespaces can't be easily roled in. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 04/25/99 10:52:00 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful [SNIP] If you use FO as a document format, you only have a formatting vocabulary at your disposal and your objects are bound to a certain media type. -h&kon H?kon Wium Lie http://www.operasoftware.com/people/howcome howcome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx simply a better browser XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Formatting Objects considered h, Reynolds, Gregg | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Guy_Murphy |
Re: XSL and XML, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Guy_Murphy |
Month |