Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:56:33 -0400 (EDT) |
[Paul Prescod] > In the XSL FO world, it seems that you need to specifically target > each disability because the FOs are not designed to degrade. No, they're not. Should they be? Time to drag this out again: <URL:http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/xsl/audioxsl.html> What do people think? I've gotten mixed feedback on it. Some people feel that providing a fallback will discourage real alternate-media stylesheets' development, but I observe that those stylesheets are almost never developed anyway. -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Fredrik Lindgren | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
XSL and Web Native distributed comp, Jonathan Borden | Date | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Jonathan Borden |
Month |