Subject: Re: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy From: "John J. Barton" <John_Barton@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:08:54 -0700 |
At 02:55 PM 4/28/99 -0400, you wrote: [...context deleted with some trepidation...] > >In a perfect world, no one would send XFOs across a network. > ? Among those of us who have drunk the wireless networking KoolAid, proxy formatting of web content for handheld viewers is the Killer App to pull the web off desktops. If the device has enough space to interpret XFOs (likely) but not for XSL (likely), what to do? The answer will be six then three then two then one proprietary formatting object set. While not perfect, transformation to XFO seems better than other alternatives. John. ______________________________________________________ John J. Barton email: John_Barton@xxxxxxxxxx MS 1U-17 Hewlett-Packard Labs 1501 Page Mill Road phone: (650)-236-2888 Palo Alto CA 94304-1126 FAX: (650)-813-3381 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | RE: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: XSL is difficult to...?, Oisin McGuinness | Date | Extension function question, Dave Pawson |
Month |