Subject: RE: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:21:20 -0400 |
At 06:41 PM 4/28/99 +0100, you wrote: >Silly question, but (modulo the invention of a few new >mime types), wouldn't the distinction between, > > Accept: text/xml, text/xsl > >and, > > Accept: text/xfo > >resolve this issue? Ie. if you're happy to recieve a >presentation-oriented server-side processed document you >use the latter. If you want it undigested, you use the >former. Interesting idea, but I think we'll end up seeing: 402 Payment Required Your browser does not list text/xfo as an acceptable delivery type. If you want this document to arrive in the Useful Markup Language, please enter your credit card number and expiration date in the form below. Thank you for your patience and your cash! Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, John J. Barton | Thread | Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, John E. Simpson |
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Simon St.Laurent | Date | Re: XSL and Web Native distributed , Jonathan Borden |
Month |