Subject: Re: XFO Mapping... From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 15:08:09 -0400 |
At 10:40 AM 5/6/99 +0100, Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >It is >unlikely that by this point you're going to be able to cage XML >distribution into a single data model, and certainly not without killing >XML+CSS, which allows people to throw any data model they want onto a Web >page (XML+CSS considered harmful? :) I'm afraid not - that's simply XML considered harmful. 'Balkanization of the Web' and all that. Popular topic about a year ago - I think Mark Pesce had something about that on Feed that made a lot of XMLers see red. I'll take semantic markup I can't understand along with a style sheet over style information with no semantics any day. At least in the former case I can probably find an explanation somewhere and build a useful transformation to something easier to work with. In the latter case - oh well. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XFO Mapping..., Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: FOs and moving on, DPawson |
Re: XSL tutorials/examples, Lars Marius Garshol | Date | Do not need the attribute, Sharmila Pandith |
Month |