Subject: Re: Formatting Object namespace URI From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 12:25:22 -0400 |
At 99/05/21 10:34 -0700, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >I feel like I must be missing simething really obvious, but in the >4-21-1999 XSL draft I can't find the URI that should be used for the fo: >prefix. Is it http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl/FO as in the previous draft? >or http://www.w3.org/XSL/Format/1.0 for similarity with XSLT? or >something else? Section 5 (4th paragraph) reads as follows: A result namespace of http://www.w3.org/XSL/Format/1.0 indicates that the result tree should be interpreted according to the semantics defined in [XSL]. XSL requires that XSL processors respect this hint. The examples in this document use the fo: prefix for this namespace. ......... Ken -- G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995) Website: XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML services outline, XSL/DSSSL shareware, stylesheet resource library, conference training schedule, commercial stylesheet training materials, on-line XSL CBT. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Formatting Object namespace URI, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | how to pass arguments to xt extensi, Smith BC (Brian) at |
RE: XSL+XML -> Non-HTML, John Dunn | Date | Re: Please help with XSL proselytiz, David Carlisle |
Month |