Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing

Subject: Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 17:49:02 +0100 (BST)
Guy> It's horses for courses.

In some ways, yes, it rather reminds me of Emacs v vi. Some people
insist on using vi when Emacs is clearly the OneTrueEditor, it's
an argument that has happily gone on for a decade or more with no sign
of abating.

But there is a difference here. XSL will presumably be going to a vote
of W3C to become a recommendation. What happens if these `xxx is harmful'
threads result in a no vote?


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread