Subject: RE: XSL-FO Does it have the guts? From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 09:48:59 +0000 (GMT) |
> > > "if there are no descenders in element (a) place element (b) on top > > > of (a) so that the topmost glyph in the part of element (b) which > > > is below any part of element (a) touches the baseline of element > > > (a), else..." .. > I like your attitude. Now, quick, someone, propose a syntax! automating this sort of typesetting is one of the goals of TeX follow-on projects (unless I misunderstand). i dont rank it as a manual thing - what I call manual is "this float logically goes on this page, but the `color' of the graphic in contrast the table opposite offends me and I shall therefore move it to the next page" > > these would be "Microsoft style sheets"? despite their patent, there > > are other systems, you know... > > I do know [1]. Feel free to suggest additions to my little museum. > Even if your language of choice can't express Microsoft packaging ;) > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Style/History/ that seems to be about HTML style sheets. what about all the typesetting system style sheet languages? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL-FO Does it have the guts?, Håkon Wium Lie | Thread | XSL FO to DVi (Was RE: XSL-FO Does , Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Re: XSL FO to DVi (Was RE: XSL-FO D, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | ISO-8859-1, Bovone Stefano |
Month |