Subject: Re: Leventhal's challenge misses the point From: "Guy Murphy" <guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:39:03 +0100 |
Hi Don. You are right it would, and in the real world if I where using the IE5 parser I would use xmlDoc.selectNodes('//section/title'); This at the moment has arisen as an MS extention to the DOM, *from* XSL. I wanted to compare XSL with W3C standard DOM, as it is this standard that is one of the cornerstones of the anti-XSL arguement. Cheers Guy > DOM with query language support will look a little less busy: > > var result = xmlDoc.getElementsByQuery("//section/title"); > for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++) > document.write("<h1>" + result[i].nodeValue + "</h1>"); > > Don > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Steve Tinney | Thread | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Linda van den Brink |
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Sara Mitchell | Date | RE: Appying XSL to dynamic part of , John Hicks |
Month |