Subject: Re: XSLT vs JSP From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:42:30 +0100 (BST) |
Chuck Robey writes: > > Oh, I find nothing wrong with the tool, Sebastian, but I wish there > could be a standard markup to be used with such a tool, so that the > sources could be standardized. i betcha I could translate properly-used "mm" or ms" groff. trouble is, I bet it isn't well used! Like LaTeX is concetually easy to transform if its properly used, but it usually isnt > *authors*, not even editors, use troff ... if it is that simple, why > cannot W3C make a markup system that is simple enough to describe it? why should they? W3C are not the be all and end all in the world, and I would say its absolutely none of their business defining general purpose markups for me to write books. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs JSP, Paul Prescod | Thread | RE: XSLT vs JSP, Håkon Wium Lie |
Administrivia -changed, XSL-List Owner | Date | Re: Advice on a web site using XML , Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |