Re: Someone bashing XSL

Subject: Re: Someone bashing XSL
From: Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Duane Nickull wrote:

> Lawrence Mielniczuk wrote:
> > 
> > So what. People have opinions that don't necessarily agree with yours. Grow up and get on with what you
> > think is important.
> <Comment type="purely professional">
> You must have misunderstood the reason I posted this message.  My reason
> for bringing this to the group are purely professional as I feel that
> anyone investing time and effort into XSL should be aware of efforts to
> undermine the perception of the language.
> The comments of Mr. Leventhal do not personally affect me and I do
> respect other opinions.
> </comment>
Furthermore, well founded objections to XSL(T) are something we should all
be aware of.  I think what Duane was trying to accomplish from this
posting was to find out from those of you who are familiar with
Levanthal's argument whether or not there is validity to his argument or

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread