Subject: Re: Someone bashing XSL From: Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:59:26 -0700 (PDT) |
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Duane Nickull wrote: > Lawrence Mielniczuk wrote: > > > > So what. People have opinions that don't necessarily agree with yours. Grow up and get on with what you > > think is important. > > <Comment type="purely professional"> > You must have misunderstood the reason I posted this message. My reason > for bringing this to the group are purely professional as I feel that > anyone investing time and effort into XSL should be aware of efforts to > undermine the perception of the language. > > The comments of Mr. Leventhal do not personally affect me and I do > respect other opinions. > </comment> > <my_take> Furthermore, well founded objections to XSL(T) are something we should all be aware of. I think what Duane was trying to accomplish from this posting was to find out from those of you who are familiar with Levanthal's argument whether or not there is validity to his argument or not. </my_take> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Someone bashing XSL, Duane Nickull | Thread | Re: Someone bashing XSL, John Eadie |
Re: Java extensions are not working, James Clark | Date | XT outputs unusual HTML4 escape cha, bbrosenstock |
Month |