Subject: Re: Version number in XSLT namespace URI From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:58:06 +0700 |
Sorry, that was supposed to go the the XSL WG list not this one. James Clark wrote: > > The discussion in XML Plenary about whether XHTML should use 1 namespace > URI or 3, summarized by Jon Bosak at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-plenary/1999Aug/0091.html > > leads me to wonder whether we've made the wrong decision in putting the > version number in the XSLT namespace URI. Would it be more in keeping > with the Namespaces Rec to do: > > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform" > version="1.0"> > > ? It would certainly make section 2.5 infinitely simpler. Has anybody > implemented 2.5 yet? I haven't and it's a bit scary. > > James > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Version number in XSLT namespace UR, James Clark | Thread | RE: Version number in XSLT namespac, DPawson |
Version number in XSLT namespace UR, James Clark | Date | Zvon: XSL-tutorial(rewritten), new , Miloslav Nic |
Month |