Subject: RE: Version number in XSLT namespace URI From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:52:12 +0100 |
James Clark wrote: >The discussion in XML Plenary about whether XHTML should use 1 >namespace >URI or 3, summarized by Jon Bosak at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-plenary/1999Aug/0091.html > >leads me to wonder whether we've made the wrong decision in putting the >version number in the XSLT namespace URI. Would it be more in keeping >with the Namespaces Rec to do: > > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform" >version="1.0"> Certainly makes more sense practically. <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0"> is distinctly ugly. Surely namespaces and versions are / should be seperate and distinct items of information? Was there any logical reason to combine them? regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Version number in XSLT namespac, James Clark | Thread | RE: Version number in XSLT namespac, Simon St.Laurent |
New XT release, James Clark | Date | How can unscribe from the XSL-List?, Davide Rossoni |
Month |