Subject: RE: What will be the future improvements of XSLT? From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:27:31 -0400 |
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 4:07 PM > Most of the Web developers I work with who are building XML-oriented > applications already have JavaScript and/or Java skills, and find XSL > occasionally useful at best, hair-pulling frustrating at worst. Yep, this is me. My programming skills are exclusively procedural, but on occasion I have found XSL to be the best bet for a particular task. And I happened to find it useful AND hair-pulling frustrating. :-) I was just starting to get to the point where I could see the power in XSL, when I finished my task and washed my hands of it, to go back to my procedural languages... David Hunter (who wishes he was weird, but usually ends up pretty normal) david.hunter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx MediaServ Information Architects http://www.MediaServ.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: What will be the future improve, David Carlisle | Thread | procedural style XSL, Earl Bingham |
RE: How to use xslt to transform xm, Michael Teigman | Date | Re: xsl:fo in web browsers, James Robertson |
Month |