RE: What does fo: stand for?

["Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

You can pick whatever you want :-) However, formatting object is better than
flow object because a formatting object could be positioned with an absolute
position and therefore won't be a flow object. So, formatting object seems
better.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chuck White
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:08 PM
To: xsl
Subject: What does fo: stand for?


I know this may seem a ridiculous question, but I'm trying to do some
documentation on FOs, and I don't see anything in the spec regarding whether
the fo: in the namespace prefix is supposed to refer to formatting object or
flow object. Is there a definitive answer to this somewhere in the spec that
someone knows of and I'm just missing it?

thanks.
Chuck White
Creative Director
ADVANCE Recruitment Advertising, Inc.
chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.advancerecruitment.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list