Subject: Re: Re:XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 23:49:23 +0000 (GMT) |
KAREN_LEICHEL@xxxxxxxx writes: > One thing I don't understand in all this discussion is why you > would even want to use InDesign. because its there? > but why use a tank to do a jeep's job? because we do not have a jeep to hand. > You still have to have Photoshop and Illustrator to do the > heavy-duty graphic fixes not sure of the relevance of this. I have never used Photoshop, and have not used Illustrator since 1986, presumably because I don't do much bitmap graphics, and generate my vector graphics myself. what does that prove? > so you're into major money and memory to do > these things. The fact that InDesign is a "good" layout engine will > not be enough. to be honest, even I can earn enough in half a day to buy all the memory that I might need to run InDesign..... Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re:XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, KAREN_LEICHEL | Thread | Re[2]: Re:XSL FOs -> PDF using InDe, KAREN_LEICHEL |
Re: template for XLink processing, Nikita Ogievetsky | Date | XMLHttpRequest, Eddy Siauwidjaja |
Month |