Subject: Re: Dependency Sorting, first of kind From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 16:36:16 +0000 |
James Clark wrote: > ... > > $a | $b returns the set of nodes that are members of $a or $b. If this > is what you mean by set union, then the set intersection of $a and $b > should be the set of nodes that are members of both $a and $b. But $a[. > = $b] does not return this; it returns the nodes in $a for which there > is a node in $b with the same value. > Yes, I confused objects with values. I read this just in time to save my sanity as to why my simple set demo wasn't working. Everything goes horribly wrong when you start operating on the values of empty elements - very non-unique... Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Dependency Sorting, first of ki, James Clark | Thread | Re: Dependency Sorting, first of ki, Ray Waldin |
RE: counter and xsl:counter-increme, Kay Michael | Date | Intercepting multiple output docume, Diarmuid Mac Carthy |
Month |