Subject: RE: Transforming HTML to WML From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:32:12 +1100 |
James Robertson, SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy, wrote:
>
>>And here is where XSLT comes into play: store the content in your own native
>>XML format, use one transformation sheet for the phones (yourXML->WML) and
>>another for the regular browsers (yourXML->XHTML).
>
>Absolutely. Very sensible.
>
>However, the original poster was asking
>about HTML->WML, or XHTML->WML.
>
>Which, as you point out, is not
>meaningful or useful.
>
>
I'm the original poster. Thank you thank you so much, I didn't realize how much I was lacking of sense! Indeed, what I was asking was neither meaningful nor useful (why don't you even say "was meaningless and useless"?). But you gave me great help by just telling everybody that you agreed P. Stark's opinion, and making us see how your memory is huge, since you could remember what stupidities the original poster had written.
Actually, what I have is not HTML but a DTD of mine that takes parts of the HTML definition, and indeed I want to XSLTransform documents of this DTD into either XHTML or WML according the final browser.
But I must be plain dumb to ask meaningless questions. Thank you again for making me realize how a good consultant you must be! Your help has been of the greatest meaning and usefulness!
Actually, I wasn't insulting you (or at least I didn't intend to). I was actually insulting WML ... :-)
For an excellent article on WAP, WML, etc, see:
------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Transforming HTML to WML, Olivier Martineau | Thread | RE: Transforming HTML to WML, Oakes, Stephen (BCE, |
Re: parsed entites, Alexandra Morgan | Date | RE: parsed entites, Mark Hayes |
Month |