Re: JavaScript

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: JavaScript

Subject: Re: JavaScript
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 02:37:21 GMT

> True enough.  But I believe the original question had a web browser
> as the destination application, not another XML parser.

'tis dangerous to rely on bugs, someone (even browser authors) may fix
them one day. 

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: JavaScript, (continued) Britt, James - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:36:56 -0700 David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:14:39 GMT Juergen Hermann - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:26:25 Britt, James - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:13:19 -0700 David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 02:37:21 GMT <= Emery, Ric - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:09:39 -0700 David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:53:51 GMT Kay Michael - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:23:09 -0000 David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:01:59 GMT

Current Thread

RE: JavaScript, (continued)
- Britt, James - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:36:56 -0700
  - David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:14:39 GMT
- Juergen Hermann - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:26:25
- Britt, James - Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:13:19 -0700
  - David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 02:37:21 GMT <=
- Emery, Ric - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:09:39 -0700
  - David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:53:51 GMT
- Kay Michael - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:23:09 -0000
  - David Carlisle - Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:01:59 GMT

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: JavaScript, Britt, James	Thread	RE: JavaScript, Emery, Ric
RE: xsl and url parameter strings, Igor Nakshin	Date	Re: Possibly Newbie questions..., Steve Tinney
	Month