Subject: RE: xsl fo lists. From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:10:04 -0000 |
Nikolai Grigoriev wrote: >Yes, it does - in FOP and in our FO2PDF; but not in the XSL WD. Err, to quote from a book 'What a mess' I'll re-read the remainder of the mail, Keep Tony G's score high :-) >Conclusion. You face a dilemma: >- if you want to render something with the present-day tools - > you are on the right way; >- if you want to compose a conformant FO - you are wrong. I want output :-) >One more comment: <fo:list-block> is a block-level object itself. >You need not wrap it into a <fo:block>: every block-level property >can be specified directly on the <fo:list-block>, and every place >where <fo:block> can go will accept <fo:list-block> as well. Point noted, thanks Nikolai. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: xsl fo lists., Nikolai Grigoriev | Thread | avt's, Pawson, David |
RE: Node with maximum attribute val, Richard Birkby | Date | RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Kay Michael |
Month |