Subject: RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:11:36 -0000 |
> > I'm testing with the 640K "1998statistics.xml" file from the > CD that comes with the "XML Bible" book and using the style sheet > "baseballstats.xsl" from the same place. On a relatively fast NT box I'm getting > times of 9 to 10 seconds. If that's from the command line, then probably 5 seconds is for initialising the Java VM and loading all the classes. If command line processing is what you intend to do, that's fine, but don't extrapolate from this to an environment where lots of stylesheets are being executed in turn (or a single stylesheet is being executed repeatedly). Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Mark Volkmann | Thread | Re: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Mark Volkmann |
RE: xsl fo lists., Pawson, David | Date | Re: XT documentation unclear ?, Jany Quintard |
Month |