Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 12:27:04 +0000 (GMT) |
James Robertson writes: > Well, from where I stand: > > * XSLT is becomming pretty common, so many > people understand it. > > * Omnimark is much more powerful, and extensible. since both are extensible, hard to see how one can be more powerful than the other.... > * Omnimark has regular expressions, which are vital > for almost all real-world work. It also has > much cleaner handling of multiple files, data > structures, etc. I think I might disagree there. the fact that XSLT forces you to use XML as your data structure for *everything* is a good clean thing > * Both have strange, bizzare syntaxes. the syntax of XSLT is XML. bizarre semantics, maybe, but the syntax is a doddle > * Both are free. but only one has multiple implementations > * Omnimark can easily handle 100+ meg documents > without requiring unreasonable amounts of RAM. and can it _sort_ that 100 megabyte document? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson | Thread | Re: XSLT vs Omnimark, Paul Tchistopolskii |
RE: Live Stock Market, Papaioannou Thanassi | Date | Re: XSLT-Machine in Perl?, Kai Ritterbusch |
Month |