Subject: RE: Future XSLT expansion. From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 07:26:38 -0500 |
Hi Michael, Michael said: Thanks, Didier, the specs are pretty impenetrable but I think most of us implementors discovered the existence of result tree fragments a few months ago. Didier replies: Yes Michael it is implemented. Sorry, I badly expressed myself. What I meant is that I thought that result fragments could be made a subset of node sets. However, reading more the specs and after the discussion, it is obvious that we reasonably can't under the current specs. This said, we can still question why this is not possible because having the possibility to obtain a node set from a variable could be potentially very useful. Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com) XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Future XSLT expansion., Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Future XSLT expansion., David Carlisle |
Re: Future XSLT expansion., David Carlisle | Date | Specifying a drive in an URI with X, Tangi Vass |
Month |