Subject: RE: Implementing " and ' in literals From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:28:39 +0100 (BST) |
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Kay Michael wrote: > > There aren't _any_ conforming implementations of XPath - > > anyone who reads the grammar carefully will know what I mean by that. > > Explain please? It's the definition of Step (I'm only including the relevant parts of the grammar): Step: AxisSpecifier NodeTest Predicate* AxisSpecifier: AxisName '::' | AbbreviatedAxisSpecifier AbbreviatedAxisSpecifier: '@'? NodeTest: NameTest | NodeType '(' ')' | 'processing-instruction' '(' Literal ')' Which allows for: '@' NodeType '(' ')' and '@' 'processing-instruction' '(' Literal ')' Which is total nonesense. -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Kay Michael |
Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant | Date | concat Param and String in XSL, Marc Tricou |
Month |