Subject: RE: Implementing " and ' in literals From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 09:29:01 +0100 |
You're saying that a construct like "@comment()" is "total nonsense". I don't think it's any more "total nonsense" than (say) "number('London')" or "/.." is. It's well-defined: it means "find all comment nodes on the attribute axis", and the result is always an empty node-set. And Saxon, at least, implements it correctly and conformantly. Mike Kay > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > There aren't _any_ conforming implementations of XPath - > > > anyone who reads the grammar carefully will know what I > mean by that. > > > > Explain please? > > It's the definition of Step (I'm only including the relevant > parts of the grammar): > Which allows for: > > '@' NodeType '(' ')' XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant | Thread | RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant |
RE: Multiple XML files for one XSL , Linda van den Brink | Date | RE: alpha comparison, Kay Michael |
Month |