Re: feature request

Subject: Re: feature request
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:19:41 +1000
At 09:19 16/05/2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

Eric van der Vlist writes:
 > The other form (using entities) seems to have defenders amongst the
 > SGMLers.
 >
 > Reading between the lines, do you mean it could be becoming deprecated
 > and that a way to go could be using XLink and XPointer ?
 >

I dont think you need read very far between the lines to find that
there is a considerable band of people who would ban entities tomorrow
if they could, in favour of Xlink etc.

Half-jokingly:


So this is the way of the future for XSLT?

If you can't support something in a way that
works (entities), attempt to
convince people that they shouldn't even want
them in the first place ... ?

J


------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread