Subject: RE: Fwds Compat/Fallback Conformance Puzzles From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:17:21 +0100 |
I agree with JC's answers, these are all errors, mainly because <xsl:fallback> and unknown xsl elements are allowed only within a template body. There is no fallback mechanism for non-instructions such as xsl:sort, nor for instructions constrained to be empty, such as xsl:text, nor for instructions with non-template content such as <xsl:choose>. It's a bit of a shame, I think, that you aren't allowed to write <xsl:new-top-level-element version="1.1"/>; to get this through an XSLT 1.0 processor you have to specify version="1.1" at the top level, which seems rather error-prone. Mike K XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Fwds Compat/Fallback Conformanc, David Hunter | Thread | RE: number for attributes vs elemen, Andrew Kimball |
RE: Saxon's Line Breaks, Kay Michael | Date | Re: Dealing with WDDX-based data, Francis Norton |
Month |