Subject: Re: Netscape Support for XSL - client vs server rant From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 08:16:20 +0100 (BST) |
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Keith Visco wrote: > > Again I apologize for off-topic responses, but I need to continue this > on the same forum in which it started to make sure the "air is cleared". > > Heather is right. > > After reading her previous posting, where she clarified what she meant, > I realize I completely misunderstood her. It took me a couple times of > re-reading to realize she was actually being sarcastic. To me the > sarcasm was very subtle...but was present. > > So Heather, I apologize, and I am very pleased to do so. I am glad to > have misunderstood the meaning of your words, than to learn that you > actually feel the way I originally thought. My biggest mistake was not > going to Heather first, and giving her the opportunity to clarify what > she meant. > > One really disappointing thing for me, however, is that I have received > lots of private e-mail from people, stating they actually feel the way I > originally thought Heather felt. I will never understand how people can > feel this way. Probably because they're now in the MS generated "something for nothing" culture that was created by pouring $600,000,000 into developing IE and MSXML, rather than the "something for everyone" culture that you're working in... Just a thought. -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Netscape Support for XSL - clie, Paulo Gaspar | Thread | Re: Netscape Support for XSL - clie, Imran Rashid |
RE: XEP?, Linda van den Brink | Date | Re: getting element name into html , Dan Morrison |
Month |