Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance From: "Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus" <Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:26:53 -0400 |
> I couldn't see a command-line switch offhand Nope, I meant in calling code. > a missing ID is not a warning, is it? It's still well formed. > isnt it mandated by the XML spec? or is that urban myth? This is in the Xerces code. There's probably an option somewhere to control it. -scott Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ord.ac.uk> cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus) Sent by: Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 07/27/2000 10:50 AM Please respond to xsl-list Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus writes: > > There just validation warningsI think a missing ID is not a warning, is it? > ... the XML file is still well formed, > and can be processed. We just happen to not stop if a validation error > occurs. We just happen to not specifically stop if a validation warning > occurs. I think you can override this behavior. I couldn't see a command-line switch offhand > In retrospect, it might > be more correct to stop processing by default if a validation warning > occurs. isnt it mandated by the XML spec? or is that urban myth? Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT engine performance, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Handling Entities in MSXML, ciaran byrne |
RE: Number of spaces linked to an a, Spychalski, Frank | Date | Re: Would you use Cocoon to a big p, Brand_Niemann |
Month |