Subject: Re: XSLT processor performance From: Paul_Dick@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:20:06 -0400 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: I should add that (to my surprise) Xalan does not recognize xsl:fallback, The example given is using xsl:fallback outside of a template-body, in a top-level element. According to the spec section 14.1 When a namespace is designated as an extension namespace and an element with a name from that namespace occurs in a template, then the element is treated as an instruction rather than as a literal result element. NOTE: Since an element that is a child of an xsl:stylesheet element is not occurring in a template, non- XSLT top-level elements are not extension elements as defined here, and nothing in this section applies to them. Xalan does implement xsl:fallback, however, in this incorrect usage, this raises the question of, Should we ignore it or alert the user of the bad stylesheet? Currently we complain. Paul XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT processor performance, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: XSLT processor performance, Sebastian Rahtz |
Summary Totals by Type, Ron Grimes | Date | RE: Desperately need help with arra, Chris Bayes |
Month |