Subject: RE: XSL Transformations Requirements Version 1.1 - a crazy idea? From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:49:14 +0100 |
> The "Crazy Idea" thread from September 1999 came up with some > interesting ideas for allowing extension functions in XSLT > itself > > > > Something like: > > > > <xsl:function name="reverse" namespace:fn="www.redrice.com"> Take a look at <saxon:function> in the current release of Saxon, which does just this. > The trouble with that is that functions would only be able to return > result tree fragments. The <saxon:function> extension returns a value using <saxon:return>, so the return value can be of any XPath data type. Mike Kay > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL Transformations Requirement, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: XSL Transformations Requirement, Francis Norton |
RE: why is select=".[true()]" bad?, Kay Michael | Date | Re: XSL Transformations Requirement, Steve Muench |
Month |