Subject: Re: XSL Transformations Requirements Version 1.1 - a crazy idea? From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 19:18:22 +0100 |
Kay Michael wrote: > > Take a look at <saxon:function> in the current release of Saxon, which does > just this. > > > The trouble with that is that functions would only be able to return > > result tree fragments. > > The <saxon:function> extension returns a value using <saxon:return>, so the > return value can be of any XPath data type. > Yes - sadly although I happily develop in Saxon I have to deliver in MSXML3, thus my interest in having this as a truly portable feature! Francis. -- Francis Norton. Defy Convention? Deify Convention! XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL Transformations Requirement, Kay Michael | Thread | Problems reading params, Matt Watson |
Re: XSL Transformations Requirement, Francis Norton | Date | RE: native, Dickson, Dan |
Month |