Subject: RE: Problem with ignoring system ID of Doctype From: Bovone Stefano <Stefano.Bovone@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:17:07 +0200 |
>Ok, this is a XML question : >We have a lot of problems with the DOCTYPE call : it seems the system ID is >mandatory (can someone confirm that ?). I know someone answered me about a >catalog in XML, much like the library in SGML. No, DOCTYPE is not mandatory: you use it to validate an XML document, if you want only a well-formed XML you can not use it. >Is there a standard for a parser (we use Oracle) that make it ignore the >DTD and use the public ID when the system ID is not good ? Is there a >standard way not to specify any system ID ? We keep our XML in a DB, and >don't want to store the system ID of the editor, as it is absolute. If you declare a SYSTEM identifier and a PUBLIC identifier I think the parser tries to use the public before, the system after (I'm not sure ..) >Another question is : Is there a way to make a URL absolute to the server, >but without the server address ? Check XML Base. Bye. >Thanks you. -- Paul Terray - terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx tel : 01 34 58 70 76 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL and JSP SESSION, Priya Pinto | Thread | Problem with ignoring system ID of , Paul Terray |
Re: MSXML v. Saxon - whose bug?, Francis Norton | Date | Re: XSLT V 1.1, David Carlisle |
Month |